Customized Course Evaluations

Evaluation Heading

Course Name:
(as it will appear on the evaluation form - ie, Introduction to Microeconomics or Econ 2A)

Your Name:
(as it will appear on the evaluation form - ie, Prof. Smith)

Academic Quarter: Do Not Include Spring 2006 Summer 2006 Fall 2006 Winter 2007 Spring 2007 Summer 2007 Fall 2007 Winter 2008 Spring 2008 Summer 2008 Fall 2008 Winter 2009 Spring 2009 Summer 2009 Fall 2009 Winter 2010 Spring 2010 Summer 2010 Fall 2010 Winter 2011 Spring 2011 Summer 2011 Fall 2011 Winter 2012 Spring 2012

Evaluation Body

Goals and Objectives
1. Objectives provided a conceptual framework for the course
2. Course goals and objectives were made clear from the beginning
3. Lectures, discussion and activities were relevant to course objectives
4. Objectives encouraged development of analytical ability

Content Knowledge
5. Instructor displayed a thorough knowledge of the subject matter
6. Instructor included recent developments in this field
7. Instructor provided useful factual knowledge and demonstrated content competence
8. Instructor related course material to practical situations
9. Instructor discussed topics in sufficient depth
10. Instructor demonstrated the significance of course topics
11. Course encouraged understanding of concepts and principles
12. Instructor clarified the relationships among the various topics covered in the course
13. Instructor distinguished between major and minor topics
14. Instructor related the subject matter to other disciplines and actual situations
15. Instructor's strong background in the subject matter facilitated my learning
16. The content was relevant to the course
17. Instructor presented alternative explanations when appropriate
18. Instructor presented examples to clarify abstract concepts
19. Instructor was able to help students conceptualize problems
20. Instructor was thoroughly familiar with experiments
21. Instructor demonstrated knowledge of equipment and tools
22. Instructor provided an adequate overview of the experiment and indicated possible areas of difficulty
23. Instructor demonstrated a command of the English vocabulary
24. Instructor displayed a command of the terminology of the discipline
25. Instructor appropriately critiqued grammar in written work
26. Instructor appropriately critiqued the organization and structure of written work

Teaching Strategies
27. Course helped develop critical thinking
28. Instructor presented alternate examples when necessary
29. Instructor integrated lectures, texts and other assigned reading
30. Field trips were appropriate and effective for this course
31. Instructor adequately managed daily administrative details
32. Instructor used a variety of appropriate teaching techniques
33. Instructor clarified material requiring explanation
34. Instructor effectively dealt with thought-provoking questions
35. Instructor maintained an atmosphere which actively encouraged thinking and learning
36. Instructor appropriately demonstrated specific lab procedures
37. Instructor encouraged development of different problem-solving strategies
38. Instructor adapted instruction to varying student skill levels
39. Instructor was flexible and changed approaches to meet new situations
40. Instructor designed the course to meet diverse student needs
41. Instructor selected relevant examples
42. Instructor presented views other than his or her own when appropriate
43. Instructor demonstrated ways of learning difficult and complicated ideas
44. Instructor indicated topic transitions
45. Instructor provided a preliminary overview of lecture at the beginning of class
46. Instructor demonstrated how lab illustrates conceptual material
47. Instructor utilized knowlege of cognitive strategies and information processing to make decisions about teaching
48. Instructor summarized key points at the conclusion of the lecture
49. Instructor responded appropriately to problem situations
50. Instructor used instructional technology appropriately
51. Instructor utilized alternative participation formats
52. Instructor utilized a variety of activities at different levels of complexity
53. Instructor encouraged active learning
54. Instructor achieved closure at the end of the session
55. Instructor signaled transition to a new point
56. Instructor encouraged student participation by asking questions
57. Instructor demonstrated enthusiasm and interest in the subject
58. Instructor utilized case studies effectively
59. Instructor engaged in problem-based learning (PBL)
60. Instructor was organized and displayed evidence of skillful preparation
61. Instructor stimulated interest in the subject
62. Instructor used appropriate teaching methods
63. Instructor provided clear and concise answers to student questions
64. Instructor selected thought-provoking materials and activities
65. Instructor skillfully facilitated class discussion
66. Instructor had a realistic appraisal of students' background and experience
67. Instructor effectively held class attention
68. Instructor helped students develop analytical problem-solving ability
69. Course helped develop skills/techniques/views needed in field
70. Course fostered respect for diverse points of view
71. Course helped develop decision-making abilities
72. Course encouraged the development of appropriate writing strategies
73. Course helped develop skills in communication and self-expression
74. Course developed awareness of strategies used to gain new knowledge
75. Handouts were valuable supplements to course
76. Group projects were well organized
77. Group projects were stimulating
78. The demonstrations and examples were helpful for learning
79. Instructor drew attention to racist or sexist bias in assigned materials
80. Experiments/exercises were well chosen and well organized
81. Procedures/techniques were clearly explained/demonstrated
82. Team teaching was appropriate for this course

Effective Presentation Skills
83. Instructor communicated his/her subject matter well
84. Instructor's speech was clear and audible
85. Instructor's command of English was adequate
86. Instructor presented material at an appropriate pace
87. Instructor presented material at an appropriate level
88. Instructor's explanations were clear and concise
89. Instructor's vocal expression made the presentation interesting
90. Instructor's presentation style faciliated note taking
91. Instructor emphasized important points
92. Instructor maintained eye contact
93. Instructor used appropriate vocabulary
94. Instructor used appropriate body language
95. Instructor coordinated audio-visual aids with oral presentation
96. Instructor varied rate, pitch and volume for emphasis
97. Instructor presented material in a conversational manner (not formalized or stylized)

Interaction with Students
98. Instructor encouraged questions/discussion in class
99. Instructor encouraged differing points of view
100. Instructor helped clarify difficult material
101. Instructor's relationship with students was good
102. Instructor treated students impartially
103. Instructor respected constructive criticism
104. Instructor was sensitive to individual interests and abilities
105. Instructor was reasonably available for personal help
106. Assistance was available during experiments/exercises and other activities
107. Critique of procedures/techniques was constructive
108. Instructor was an effective discussion leader
109. Instructor encouraged student participation in class discussions and stimulated independent thinking
110. Instructor faciliated discussion among students as opposed to discussions only between the instructor and students
111. Instructor was willing to explore a variety of points of view
112. Instructor critiqued student's work without personalizing the critique
113. The class atmosphere was conducive to student learning
114. Instructor was able to deal effectively with student difficulties
115. Instructor stimulated students to intellectual effort beyond that required by most courses
116. Instructor was tactful in interaction with students
117. Instructor solicited and respected student feedback
118. Instructor responded constructively to student opinions
119. Instructor checked student understanding before proceeding to next topic
120. Instructor showed concern for student progress
121. Instructor perceived students' needs
122. Instructor's interaction with students reflected understanding of academic/cultural diversity and gender equity
123. Instructor demonstrated awareness of different learning styles among students
124. Instructor was approachable
125. Instructor was interested in student learning

Activities and Assignments
126. Assignments contributed to my learning
127. Work required was appropriate for credit given
128. Assignments helped achieve course objectives
129. Textbook was suitable for this course
130. Assigned reading faciliated understanding of course material
131. Assigned reading complemented instructor's lecture
132. Amount of required reading was reasonable
133. Number of problems was reasonable
134. Level of difficulty of problems was reasonable
135. Assigned problems were important for understanding material
136. Assignments involved application of concepts discussed in class
137. Number and length of assigned papers were reasonable
138. Assignments reinforced course concepts
139. Group projects were appropriate for this course
140. Experiments/exercises and activities were important supplements to course
141. Experiments/activities helped develop important skills
142. Experiments/activities were of appropriate level of difficulty
143. Equipment available for experiments and exercises was adequate
144. Equipment was in good operating condition
145. Access to lab/equipment/tools was adequate
146. Assigned reports required reasonable time and effort
147. Reports were promptly and fairly graded and returned
148. Assignments required original thought
149. Background expected of students was realistic

Grading and Evaluation
150. Exam questions fairly reflected course content
151. Exam questions were clear
152. Exams emphasized conceptual understanding rather than memorization
153. Instructor clearly indicated material to be covered on exams
154. Exams fairly tested my learning/understanding of course material
155. Exams covered a reasonable amount of course material
156. Sufficient time was allowed for exams
157. Exams required synthesis of course concepts and information
158. Exams emphasized major topics
159. Exams were of appropirate level of difficulty
160. Exams were compatible with course objectives
161. Exams were graded fairly
162. The course included an appropriate number of exams
163. Written comments on returned exams were helpful
164. Written comments on returned assignments were helpful
165. The grading system was clearly explained
166. Grading was consistent with stated objectives
167. Closed-book exams were appropriate for this course
168. Open-book exams were appropriate for this course
169. Take-home exams were appropriate for this course
170. Quizzes were appropriate for this course
171. Instructor indicated what was expected of students on tests, essays, or assignments
172. Instructor ensured that principles of academic honesty were upheld
173. Exam questions were sufficiently varied to accomodate students' different learning styles

General Competency
174. Instructor is one of the best instructors I have had
175. I would recommend this course to other students
176. I would recommend this instructor to other students
177. Writing and drawing at board were legible
178. Instructor's emphasis on safety was reasonable
179. Instructor's professional attitude/behavior with students was exemplary
180. Instructor conveyed the importance of teaching and learning
181. Instructor was enthusiastic about the discipline

Custom Questions
Enter your own questions below, or leave the fields blank.

182.

183.

184.

185.

186.

When you click the Submit button the final formatted course evaluation page will appear. You can then print the questionnaire using your browser's print option.

This list was compiled by teaching assistants who reviewed hundreds of evaluation items found in a variety of sources over several years. We thank all who participate in this project for adapting and compiling this list.